Organization

Charter Communications LLC

Isp United States

IPv4 addresses

14,006,136

CIDR ranges

8,841

Reputation · trust score

A transparent 0–100 signal. Every entity starts at a neutral baseline of 65; threat-intel blocklists, exposure, reverse-DNS, routing and allocation each adjust it up or down. Higher is more trustworthy.

70/100

Moderate

How this score is built

Baseline (neutral) 65
Isp allocation +5
Trust score 70 / 100

Experimental · trust-vectors model v1.2.1 — a transparent heuristic, not a definitive verdict. How it works →

Countries served by Charter Communications LLC

Every country where this organization has IPv4 allocations, ranked by IPs held.

United States 14.18M

ASNs owned by Charter Communications LLC

ASN	Name	IPs	Prefixes	Country
AS20115	Charter Communications LLC	12.41M	6,886	US
AS33588	Charter Communications LLC	841.9K	1,070	US
AS22516	Charter Communications LLC	660.9K	770	US
AS16787	Charter Communications LLC	145.7K	54	US
AS40294	Charter Communications LLC	38.9K	8	US
AS19115	Charter Communications LLC	36.9K	28	US
AS40264	Charter Communications LLC	15.1K	19	US
AS22677	Charter Communications LLC	4.6K	10	US
AS19157	Charter Communications LLC	4.4K	5	US
AS22974	Charter Communications LLC	3.8K	7	US
AS23132	Charter Communications LLC	3.1K	4	US
AS22710	Charter Communications LLC	2.6K	2	US
AS23222	Charter Communications LLC	2.6K	2	US
AS22513	Charter Communications LLC	2.6K	2	US
AS23200	Charter Communications LLC	1.0K	1	US

Largest CIDR ranges

CIDR	IPs	PTR Density	ASN	Country	State	City
24.180.0.0/14	262.1K	98.3%	AS20115	US	Michigan	Kalamazoo
47.132.0.0/14	262.1K	98.5%	AS20115	US	North Carolina	Kitty Hawk
75.132.0.0/14	262.1K	98.7%	AS20115	US	Missouri	St Louis
75.136.0.0/14	262.1K	98.6%	AS20115	US	Georgia	Summerville
97.88.0.0/14	262.1K	98.5%	AS20115	US	Wisconsin	Eau Claire
174.80.0.0/14	262.1K	98.6%	AS20115	US	Vermont	Lyndonville
35.148.0.0/15	131.1K	98.5%	AS20115	US	California	Norwalk
47.12.0.0/15	131.1K	98.6%	AS20115	US	Wisconsin	Janesville
47.24.0.0/15	131.1K	98.6%	AS20115	US	Missouri	Chesterfield
47.38.0.0/15	131.1K	98.6%	AS20115	US	South Carolina	Pelzer
47.40.0.0/15	131.1K	98.5%	AS20115	US	Michigan	Holland
47.232.0.0/15	131.1K	98.6%	AS20115	US	Missouri	City of Saint Peters
69.144.0.0/15	131.1K	98.5%	AS33588	US	Wyoming	Casper
71.82.0.0/15	131.1K	98.3%	AS20115	US	Alabama	Montgomery
72.174.0.0/15	131.1K	98.7%	AS33588	US	Colorado	Grand Junction
96.32.0.0/15	131.1K	98.6%	AS20115	US	Connecticut	Woodstock
96.38.0.0/15	131.1K	98.7%	AS20115	US	Tennessee	Knoxville
96.40.0.0/15	131.1K	97.4%	AS20115	US	Nebraska	Kearney
97.80.0.0/15	131.1K	98.5%	AS20115	US	Alabama	Decatur
97.84.0.0/15	131.1K	98.3%	AS20115	US	Missouri	Florissant
172.222.0.0/15	131.1K	98.2%	AS20115	US	Michigan	Ludington
184.166.0.0/15	131.1K	98.6%	AS33588	US	Wyoming	Riverton
23.84.0.0/16	65.5K	98.6%	AS20115	US	Missouri	Union
23.87.0.0/16	65.5K	98.5%	AS20115	US	Wisconsin	Rhinelander
24.107.0.0/16	65.5K	98.5%	AS20115	US	Missouri	St Louis
24.151.0.0/16	65.5K	98.5%	AS20115	US	Tennessee	Maryville
24.158.0.0/16	65.5K	98.5%	AS20115	US	South Carolina	Greenville
24.178.0.0/16	65.5K	98.6%	AS20115	US	Illinois	East Saint Louis
24.181.0.0/16	65.5K	98.6%	AS20115	US	South Carolina	Piedmont
24.197.0.0/16	65.5K	98.5%	AS20115	US	North Carolina	Newton
24.217.0.0/16	65.5K	98.6%	AS20115	US	Missouri	O'Fallon
24.247.0.0/16	65.5K	98.5%	AS20115	US	Michigan	Traverse City
35.129.0.0/16	65.5K	98.6%	AS20115	US	Missouri	St Louis
47.4.0.0/16	65.5K	98.7%	AS20115	US	Texas	Fort Worth
47.14.0.0/16	65.5K	98.5%	AS20115	US	Massachusetts	Worcester
47.26.0.0/16	65.5K	98.5%	AS20115	US	Michigan	Sturgis
47.33.0.0/16	65.5K	98.5%	AS20115	US	Nevada	Reno
47.34.0.0/16	65.5K	98.5%	AS20115	US	Wisconsin	Madison
47.36.0.0/16	65.5K	98.6%	AS20115	US	Georgia	Smyrna
47.46.0.0/16	65.5K	95.1%	AS20115	US	Michigan	Oxford
47.48.0.0/16	65.5K	98.5%	AS20115	US	Nebraska	Kearney
47.50.0.0/16	65.5K	98.6%	AS20115	US	Michigan	Grandville
47.132.0.0/16	65.5K	98.5%	AS20115	US	North Carolina	Kitty Hawk
47.224.0.0/16	65.5K	98.5%	AS20115	US	Michigan	Cadillac
47.226.0.0/16	65.5K	98.5%	AS20115	US	Alabama	Montgomery
47.229.0.0/16	65.5K	98.6%	AS20115	US	California	Glendale
66.52.0.0/16	65.5K	98.4%	AS20115	US	Texas	Spring
66.188.0.0/16	65.5K	98.5%	AS20115	US	Wisconsin	Chippewa Falls
68.117.0.0/16	65.5K	98.6%	AS20115	US	Minnesota	Mankato
68.184.0.0/16	65.5K	98.5%	AS20115	US	Missouri	St Louis
68.190.0.0/16	65.5K	98.5%	AS20115	US	Alabama	Hoover
69.146.0.0/16	65.5K	98.6%	AS33588	US	Montana	Billings
71.11.0.0/16	65.5K	98.5%	AS20115	US	North Carolina	Black Mountain
71.12.0.0/16	65.5K	98.6%	AS20115	US	South Carolina	Simpsonville
71.14.0.0/16	65.5K	98.5%	AS20115	US	Alabama	Birmingham
71.81.0.0/16	65.5K	98.5%	AS20115	US	Louisiana	Mandeville
71.87.0.0/16	65.5K	98.2%	AS20115	US	Tennessee	Sevierville
71.89.0.0/16	65.5K	98.5%	AS20115	US	Wisconsin	Wausau
71.90.0.0/16	65.5K	98.5%	AS20115	US	Wisconsin	Sheboygan
75.129.0.0/16	65.5K	98.7%	AS20115	US	Illinois	Centralia
75.132.0.0/16	65.5K	98.6%	AS20115	US	Missouri	St Louis
75.137.0.0/16	65.5K	98.6%	AS20115	US	Georgia	Carrollton
75.139.0.0/16	65.5K	98.7%	AS20115	US	Georgia	Athens
75.142.0.0/16	65.5K	98.7%	AS20115	US	Washington	Yakima
96.35.0.0/16	65.5K	98.6%	AS20115	US	Illinois	Alton
96.42.0.0/16	65.5K	96.5%	AS20115	US	Michigan	Oxford
97.80.0.0/16	65.5K	98.2%	AS20115	US	Alabama	Decatur
97.83.0.0/16	65.5K	98.7%	AS20115	US	Michigan	Petoskey
97.85.0.0/16	65.5K	98.2%	AS20115	US	Missouri	St Louis
97.89.0.0/16	65.5K	98.7%	AS20115	US	Georgia	Covington
97.92.0.0/16	65.5K	98.7%	AS20115	US	Nebraska	Kearney
97.95.0.0/16	65.5K	98.6%	AS20115	US	Michigan	Lapeer
98.127.0.0/16	65.5K	98.7%	AS33588	US	Montana	Helena
131.93.0.0/16	65.5K	98.9%	AS20115	US	Michigan	Ironwood
137.25.0.0/16	65.5K	98.6%	AS20115	US	California	Riverside
137.27.0.0/16	65.5K	98.5%	AS20115	US	California	Riverside
147.219.0.0/16	65.5K	98.7%	AS20115	US	Wisconsin	Madison
155.186.0.0/16	65.5K	98.6%	AS20115	US	Georgia	Athens
172.220.0.0/16	65.5K	98.1%	AS20115	US	Wisconsin	Madison
174.45.0.0/16	65.5K	98.7%	AS33588	US	Montana	Billings
174.84.0.0/16	65.5K	98.6%	AS20115	US	Michigan	Midland
174.86.0.0/16	65.5K	98.6%	AS20115	US	Missouri	O'Fallon
16.203.0.0/17	32.8K	98.6%	AS20115	US	—	—
24.107.0.0/17	32.8K	98.6%	AS20115	US	Missouri	St Louis
24.159.0.0/17	32.8K	98.6%	AS20115	US	Tennessee	Cleveland
24.171.0.0/17	32.8K	98.5%	AS20115	US	Missouri	St Louis
24.176.0.0/17	32.8K	98.5%	AS20115	US	Tennessee	Maryville
24.177.0.0/17	32.8K	98.6%	AS20115	US	Wisconsin	Lodi
24.179.128.0/17	32.8K	98.6%	AS20115	US	Wisconsin	Fond du Lac
24.180.128.0/17	32.8K	97.9%	AS20115	US	Michigan	Kalamazoo
24.183.0.0/17	32.8K	98.6%	AS20115	US	Wisconsin	Madison
24.196.0.0/17	32.8K	98.5%	AS20115	US	Alabama	Birmingham
24.197.0.0/17	32.8K	98.5%	AS20115	US	North Carolina	Boone
24.205.0.0/17	32.8K	98.5%	AS20115	US	California	Glendale
24.207.128.0/17	32.8K	98.6%	AS20115	US	Missouri	St Louis
24.231.128.0/17	32.8K	98.7%	AS20115	US	Michigan	Grand Haven
24.236.128.0/17	32.8K	98.6%	AS20115	US	Michigan	Big Rapids
24.240.0.0/17	32.8K	98.5%	AS20115	US	Georgia	Covington
24.241.0.0/17	32.8K	98.6%	AS20115	US	Missouri	Fenton
35.129.128.0/17	32.8K	98.5%	AS20115	US	Missouri	St Louis

Frequently Asked Questions

How many IP addresses does Charter Communications LLC own?

Charter Communications LLC controls 14.01M IPv4 addresses distributed across 8,841 CIDR ranges. The organization is registered in United States.

What ASNs does Charter Communications LLC operate?

Charter Communications LLC operates 15 Autonomous Systems. Each ASN represents an independently routed network that Charter Communications LLC manages for internet traffic delivery.

What type of organization is Charter Communications LLC?

Charter Communications LLC is categorized as isp. This classification is based on the organization's primary use of its IP address allocations.

Last updated: 2026-10-13 18:24:05 UTC